Studies & Reports of the PCA General Assembly
AD INTERIM STUDY COMMITTEE ON
WOMEN IN THE MILITARY
CONSENSUS REPORT
[Minutes of 29th General
Assembly, 29-57, pp. 259-278.]
Index of all
relevant texts in the 2001 and 2002 PCA Minutes |
Women
in the Military (WIM) Committee Final Report ---------------------- |
M30GA, 30-54,
p. 282 and 30-57,
p. 283 |
Communications
1, 2 and 6--------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, pp. 287 - 289 |
Consensus Report 2001------------------------------------------------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 259 - 278 |
Final
Recommendations 2002------------------------------------------------------ |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 285 |
Final
Recommendations, 2001------------------------------------------------------ |
M29GA, 29-57, XI, p. 277 & M30GA,
p. 286 |
"Man's Duty
to Protect Woman" [Majority Report, 2001] -------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, pp. 278 - 308 |
Minority
Report 2002---------------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 287 |
Minority Report
2001---------------------------------------------------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 308 - 320 |
Overtures 2, 21 and 26--------------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-53, III, 7, p. 245; 30-57,
5, p. 287 |
Supplemental
Report 2002----------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 287 |
"Recommendations
for the Wise Counsel of the Church" ------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 308 - 320 |
Motion
to Send Report to the President [motion failed] |
M30GA, 30-60, p. 290 |
Consensus
Report
REPORT TO GENERAL ASSEMBLY
AD INTERIM STUDY COMMITTEE ON WOMEN IN THE
MILITARY
NOTE: Sections 1 through XI, below, are the committee's
effort to carve out an area of agreement, thereby allowing the Assembly
to better understand the parameters of disagreement. Therefore, Sections
I through XI are submitted to the Assembly by the entire committee, with
no dissent. Commissioners will note that the area we could not come to
agreement surrounds the question of whether women not participating in
offensive combat is a matter of duty, or simply wise counsel. (Please
see the final paragraph of Section IX, Scriptural Premises.)
It had been our hope to have two papers attached to this consensus report,
detailing the duty and wise counsel positions. We apologize that we have
found ourselves unable to complete those papers in time for this mailing.
When they are completed, we will publish them on the internet and send
out a letter informing the church of their address. Hard copies will also
be available for commissioners to the 29'x' General Assembly.
It is the nature of a consensus document that both sides will find certain
of its statements less than satisfactory; nevertheless, with that caveat
we humbly submit this consensus part of our report for the Assembly's
consideration and judgment.
I. Purpose of Ad Interim Study Committee on Women in the Military
The Ad Interim Study Committee on Women in the Military (AISCWIM) was
created by action of the 26th Assembly in 1998. This action is found in
the Minutes of the 26th Assembly, pp. 209ff. The purposes of the Committee
were set forth as:
1. To "consider the theological and ethical issues raised by women
in combat roles andlor military service. "
2. To receive the referred overture from Philadelphia Presbytery.
3. To receive the referred report of the Bills and Overtures Committee.
4. To report to the 27th General Assembly.
5. To consider the decisions of the Reformed Church in the United States
(RCVS); the Reformed Presbyterian Church, North America (RPCNA); the Southern
Baptist Convention (SBC); and the Communication from the Presbyterian
and Reformed Joint Commission on Chaplains and Military Personnel (PRJC).
II. History of Ad Interim Study Committee on Women in the Military
In 1996, Overture 20 from Philadelphia Presbytery asked the Assembly to
condemn, protest, and request the repeal of the national policy allowing
women to serve in combat. It further requested that elders, military chaplains
and other church officials "communicate with their members God's teaching
concerning women in combat."
The Assembly adopted the following motion from the floor: "The PCA, without
attempting to intermeddle in civil affairs (WCF 31-4) expresses grave
concern about the practice of sending women into combat and asks one of
its courts, Philadelphia Presbytery, to bring a more detailed recommendation
to the 25th General Assembly.
In 1997, Overture 13 from Philadelphia Presbytery brought an extended
Rationale. It further asked that the Assembly indicate "that this communication
also be construed as an expression of contrite appeal for recognition
that such a monstrous overturning of God's intention for man and woman
has progressed in public view over several decades without notice or Biblical
counsel by the Church, a manifest expression of our own sinful negligence
and lack of love, for which we beg humble forgiveness from those who govern,
from the citizens, and from God."
The Assembly adopted the recommendation of its Bills and Overtures Committee
that the Overture be answered in the negative. It indicated that the "situation
does not justify the Assembly's intervention in a political matter"(WCF
31-4), and that the "Biblical arguments were not entirely persuasive"
(WCF 1-6). It was not persuaded that the Assembly had sinned in this regard,
and it questioned whether women serving in combat would be subject to
discipline if the Overture were adopted.
In 1998, Overture 26 from Philadelphia Presbytery asked the Assembly to
appoint a privately funded Ad Interim Study Committee on Women in the
(AISCWIM). The Assembly appointed this committee to "consider the theological
and ethical issues raised by women in combat roles and/or military service."
The Assembly also mandated that this committee "consider the decisions
of the Reformed Church in the United States (RCUS); the Reformed Presbyterian
Church, North America (RPCNA); the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC);
and Communication from the Presbyterian and Reformed Joint Commission
on Chaplains and Military Personnel (PRJC) (relative to Overture 26; see
also Recommendation 16)."
In 1999 a Report was presented by AISCWIM. A motion "to receive as information
the present report to be used as advice and that the report be referred
back to the Committee to perfect for the 28th Assembly, and that the committee
be expanded by adding three new members appointed by the Moderator" was
made, seconded and adopted.
I n 2000, AISCWIM presented an interim report, asking for a year's extension
to complete its work by the 29th Assembly. The Assembly approved this
motion.
III. Current Review of Military Service of Women
The feminization of the military is an idea whose time has come, not only
for American armed forces, but for other nations also. In the American
context, the leadership of Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the
Services (DACOWITS) has advanced this process. The DACOWITS charter, filed
on February 28, 1998, says of its duties, "In carrying out its duties,
the Committee serves as a vital link between the civilian community and
the Department of Defense regarding the need for, and role of, women as
an integral part of the Armed Forces. Through its work, the Committee
encourages public acceptance of military service as a citizenship responsibility
and as a career field for qualified women in the Services."
Although governmental leaders and feminist writers have offered able
defenses of the successful nature of the integration of women into the
military services, there are numerous concerns and problems associated
with the novel experiment of feminizing the American military services.
Here is a sampling:
· sexual immorality (fornication, adultery, prostitution), particularly
in basic training;
· sexual harassment and abuse, including that of inferiors by superiors;
· pregnancy, preventing military readiness;
· inferior physical strength and stamina; differing standards of physical
performance by men and women;
· women's unique limitations for combat;
· loss of fighting effectiveness;
· religious complications of women's service ( e.g. Islamic coverings
and military uniforms);
· loss of properly trained personnel due to difficulty of assigning women
to combat;
· loss of superior younger rank officers due to dissatisfaction with gender
norming and feminine integration;
· promotion of inferior younger rank officers due to social policy of
integration of women in services, rather than effective leadership;
· expense of refitting equipment for both sexes; attendant decrease in
military readiness and power;
· subordination of wives to overriding directives of superior officers.
Finally, one critical aspect of the situation caused by the feminization
of the military is the possible conscription of women; proposals to do
so loom on the horizon and cannot easily be dismissed. Our all-volunteer
military is not meeting its quotas at a time when the American armed services
is very broadly deployed in different parts of the world.
IV. The Honor of a Military Calling
Since the Fall, the warrior and military have been necessary for the protection
of life, beliefs, and property. When properly exercised by moral God-fearing
authorities, and carried out by men of faith, the duties of the military
profession have been honorable. To pledge to give one's life for another
is a high calling.
One of the earliest accounts of organized military action used properly
was the use of force by Abraham to rescue Lot and his entire household.[1]
Abraham's servants, ' Genesis 14 three hundred strong, were skilled in
the use of weapons-they were soldiers, trained in the art of war.[2]
These men served well, protecting family and assets.
Exodus presents an account of the nation of Israel coming out from the
land of Egypt and wandering in the wilderness. The nation moved en masse
and the women provided non-combat, logistical support. In Exodus 17, we
find an account of the battle against the Amalekites led by Joshua (Yahweh
saves), under the staff of God held by Moses.[3]
In Exodus 32, we find the description of the rebellion of Israel against
the Lord. Complying with God's instructions, Moses there called the men
of his own tribe of Levi to put down the rebellion:
(Moses) said to them, "Thus says the LORD, the
God of Israel, 'Every man of you put his sword upon his thigh,
and go back and forth from gate to gate in the camp, and kill every
man his brother, and every man his friend, and every man his neighbor.'"[4] |
"In Numbers 1, we find a special census of Israel taken: "Take a census
of all the congregation of the children of Israel, by their families,
by their father's houses, according to the number of names, every male
individually, from twenty years old and above-all who are able to go to
war in Israel."[5] Later in the chapter, we read,
"So all who were numbered of the children of Israel, by their father's
houses, from twenty years old and above, all who were able to go to war
in Israel-all who were numbered were six hundred and three thousand five
hundred and fifty."[6] Again, men were set aside
for a specific task-the art of war.
Men were organized, by tribe, to fight as cohesive units; so today's military
also is organized in cohesive units, each with its own leaders. The army
of Israel was sizeable by anyone's standards.
In Joshua 5, Christ in His preincarnate form appears to Joshua with sword
in hand, Commander of the Lord's army. Whatever God does can only be honorable.
"And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted his eyes
and looked, and behold, a man stood opposite him with His sword drawn
in His hand. And Joshua went to Him and said to Him, 'Are you for us or
our adversaries?' So He said, 'No, but as Commander of the army of the
Lord I have now come.' And Joshua fell on his face to the earth and worshipped,
and said to Him, 'What does my Lord say to His servant?' Then the Commander
of the Lord's army said to Joshua, 'Take your sandals off for the place
where you stand is holy.' And Joshua did so."[7]
Again, the Lord came as a just and honorable warrior--Captain of the Lord's
army. He could have appeared in any form but chose to appear as a warrior.
In Luke 3, soldiers convicted of sin inquired of John the Baptist what
they must do to be saved. John the Baptist did not condemn their profession,
but told them how to conduct themselves in Godliness: "Do not intimidate
anyone or accuse them falsely, and be content with your wages."[8]
Luke also records how a Roman centurion came to Jesus, requesting healing
for his sick servant.[9] Jesus could have used
this opportunity to take the centurion to task concerning his profession,
but instead upheld him as an example of faith, saying, "I say to you,
I have not found such great faith, not even in Israel."[10]
In our own American experience, a number of military leaders have had
a profound Christian faith. The Revolutionary War has been known as a
Presbyterian uprising. In fact, King George III often said, "There go
our American cousins running off with their Presbyterian ministers."[11]
George Washington was a man of faith that literally kept the dream alive
during the long arduous years of the American Revolution. He was a leader
often on his knees in prayer. At Yorktown, when General Cornwallis surrendered
to George Washington, of Washington's ten senior military staff, nine
were Presbyterian elders.[12]
During the Civil War many devout Christians served in both the Union and
Confederate armies.[13] General Robert E. Lee
was devout; Stonewall Jackson was a Presbyterian deacon;[14]
General Joshua Chamberlain, a Medal of Honor winner wounded five times
during the war, served as a professor of Christian ethics and rhetoric
at Bowdoin College.
Scripture presents God Himself as Warrior,[15]
and examples from Scripture and history of Godly men in uniform defending
their wives and children against attack could be multiplied. Suffice it
to say that the military profession is an honorable calling, recognized
and attended by God's blessings throughout history.[16]
V. Relevant Viewpoints from Church History
The history of the Church's views on women serving in the military reveals
that the Church has stood opposed; this was never a significant issue
because warfare was a male duty. Still, there are passing statements indicative
of their views:
Josephus: Beware, above all in battle, that no woman
assume the accoutrements of a man nor a man the apparel of a woman.[17]
Chrysostom: O ye subverters of all decency, who use men as if they
were women, and lead out women to war as if they were men! This
is the work of the devil, to subvert and confound all things, to
overlap the boundaries that have been appointed from the beginning,
and remove those which God has set to nature. For God assigned to
woman the care of the house only, to the man the conduct of public
affairs. But you reduce the head to the feet, and raise the feet
to the head. You suffer women to bear arms, and are not ashamed.[18] |
Note that Chrysostom sees the male warrior role as having "been appointed
from the beginning," and thus a Creation ordinance. Again, Chrysostom:
... what say you to these-when he equips the females
with arms, and helmets, and greaves, and says that the human race
has no occasion to differ from the canine! Since dogs, he says,
the female and the male, do just the same things in common, so let
the woman do the same works as the men, and let all be turned upside
down. For the devil has always endeavored by their means to show
that our race is not more honorable than that of brutes.[19] |
For women to serve as warriors, Chrysostom says, effaces the unique
character of men and women as bearers of God's Image, reducing them to
brutish animals; thus he points, again, to the Creation ordinance.
Luther declares it to be a man's binding duty to defend his wife and children:
The question whether without offending God or our conscience,
we may defend ourselves against the emperor, if he should seek to
subjugate us, is rather one for lawyers, than for divines. If the
emperor proceed to war upon us, he intends either to destroy our
preaching, and our religion, or to invade and confound public policy
and economy, that is to say, the temporal government and administration.
In either case, it is no longer as emperor of the Romans, legally
elected we are to regard him but as a tyrant; it is, therefore,
futile to ask whether we may combat for the upright, pure doctrine,
and for religion; it is for us a law and a duty to combat for wife,
for children, servants, and subjects; we are bound to defend them
against maleficent power.[20] |
Finally, Calvin declares that the prevention of women from bearing firearms
in military service flows from the natural order, again indicating a Creation
ordinance. He also indicates such service violates the Seventh Commandment
of God's Moral Law.
For it is good reason that there should be a difference
between men and women. And although there be no law written, doth
not even nature teach it us? ... In so doing they seem to be sorry
that God made them not women and to be desirous to renounce their
own sex. And that is a shameful thing. Again when women go apparelled
like men of war, (as there be some which had leave to bear a hackbutte
[an ancient firearm] on their shoulder than a distaffe in their
hand) it is against kinde, and we ought to abhor it.... I have told
you already that all the laws which are written here concern manners
and are rules of good life, and are to be referred to the Ten Commandments.
For God hath not added anything to those ten sentences... As how?
For in forbidding adultery, God not only forbids the act itself,
which were punishable and worthy of reproach even before men; but
also he forbids in effect all unchaste behavior, so as none may
appear, neither in apparel nor in any part of our conversation...
which mischief to eschew, both men and women must have a care to
follow every of them their own vocation ... but they despise God
and nature more than they ever did.[21] |
Thus we see a few representative excerpts from Ancient and Reformation
fathers indicative of their opposition to the service of women in military
combat; and they saw this opposition as flowing from Creation ordinance
and God's Moral Law.
VI. Contemporary Ecclesiastical Views
In 1996, the Special Committee of the RCUS to Study the Biblical View
of Women Serving in the Military adopted the following recommendations:
1. The 250th session of the Synod of the Reformed Church
in the United States, upon due examination of Holy Scripture in
both the Old and New Testaments, finds no biblical warrant for women
serving in enforced military service; but on the contrary, finds
that women are to be protected from enforced military service that
they might fulfill their calling and duties under God as set forth
in the order of creation. Further, women are not to serve in combat
roles. That member Churches of the Reformed Church in the United
States make this study available to its members as a part of teaching
the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27; 2 Timothy 3:16 17).[22] |
In 1998, the Southern Baptist Convention passed the following resolutions:
1. That the messengers to the Southern Baptist Convention,
meeting June 9-11, 1998, in Salt Lake City, Utah, do, with loyal
respect and deep concern, warn against and oppose the training and
assigning of females to military combat service because: it rejects
gender-based distinctions established by God in the order of creation;
it undermines male headship in the family by failing to recognize
the unique gender-based responsibility of men to protect women and
children; and it subordinates the combat readiness of American troops
and the national security of the United States, to the unbiblical
social agenda of ideological feminism.
2. That we give deepest gratitude and honor to those courageous
women who have served their country in military support roles.
3. That we commit our prayer support to all military members and
families serving this great nation around the world.
4. That we call upon the President, Congress, and all military leaders
to reverse the present policy and to restore the historic limitation
of military combat service to males only.[23] |
In 1998, the General Synod of the Bible Presbyterian Church adopted
a resolution that says, in part:
The members of the 62nd General Synod of the Bible
Presbyterian Church meeting in Lakeland, Florida, August 6-11, 1998,
out of loyalty and respect warns against the policy of sending females
into combat. This unbiblical practice follows the social agenda
of ideological feminism and undermines the male leadership role.
While we commend women who have served honorably in our military
in the many areas of support roles, we urge any of our members who
are considering military service to take counsel of its sessions
as to the teaching of God's Word on this matter. We call for a reversal
of the policy of women in combat.[24] |
In 1998, the Reformed Presbyterian Church, North America, adopted the
following:
1. That, while recognizing the right and duty that women
have to self defense, which may involve physical violence (Judges
9:53), it is our conviction that Biblical teaching does not give
warrant to employ women for military combat.
2. That we direct all presbyteries and sessions to instruct their
congregations in this regard.
3. That we urge any of our female members who are considering
or presently engaged in military service 'to take counsel of their
Sessions as to the teaching of God's Word in the matter.
4. That the Clerk of the Synod send a copy of this resolution
to the North American Presbyterian and Reformed Council (NAPARC),
and the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), and to our
military chaplains.
5. That the Moderator of the Synod be directed to assign a representative
to present a copy of this resolution to the President of the United
Sates, the Senate, and the House of Representatives.[25]
|
In 2000, the Orthodox Presbyterian Church considered two reports regarding
the Role of Women in the Military and Combat; the matter was referred
to the subsequent, 2001, General Assembly with no definitive action taken.
VII. Ecclesiology: The Church's Spirituality, Power, and Message
The Church's Spirituality and Gospel Power We begin with the recognition
that it lies outside the jurisdiction of this court to address political
and federal practice.[26] Our Standards clearly
teach that the business of the Assembly is to be exclusively ecclesiastical.
That is, it is to handle nothing but the business of the church-spiritual
matters regulated by Divine Revelation.
The Assembly is not to insert itself into civil affairs except under certain
carefully prescribed conditions. Matters of national and political policy
fall outside the jurisdiction of our church courts and are to be "determined
by the state in the light of human reason and the course of providential
events."[27]
The Westminster Confession clearly states what a General Assembly must do, and what it may not do.
It belongeth to synods and councils, ministerially
to determine controversies of faith, and cases of conscience; to
set down rules and directions for the better ordering of the public
worship of God, and government of his church; to receive complaints
in cases of maladministration, and authoritatively to determine
the same ...[28]
Synods and councils are to handle, or conclude nothing, but that
which is ecclesiastical; and are not to intermeddle with civil affairs
which concern the commonwealth, unless by way of humble petition
in cases extraordinary, or, by way of advice, for satisfaction of
conscience, if they be thereunto required by the civil magistrate.[29] |
The Book of Church Order, also, clearly asserts the spiritual
nature and character of the Church:
3.1 The power which Christ has committed to
His Church vests in the whole body, the rulers and those ruled,
constituting it a spiritual commonwealth. This power, as exercised
by the people, extends to the choice of those officers whom He has
appointed in His Church.
3.2 Ecclesiastical power, which is wholly spiritual, is twofold.
The officers exercise it sometimes severally, as in preaching the
Gospel, administering the Sacraments, reproving the erring, visiting
the sick, and comforting the afflicted, which is the power of order;
and they exercise it sometimes jointly in Church courts, after the
form of judgment, which is the power of jurisdiction.
3.3 The sole functions of the Church, as a kingdom and government
distinct from the civil commonwealth, are to proclaim, to administer,
and to enforce the law of Christ revealed in the Scriptures.
3.4 The power of the Church is exclusively spiritual; that
of the State includes the exercise of force. The constitution of
the Church derives from divine revelation; the constitution of the
State must be determined by human reason and the course of providential
events. The Church has no right to construct or modify a government
for the State, and the State has no right to frame a creed or polity
for the Church. They are planets moving in concentric orbits: "Render
unto Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that
are God's" (Matthew 22:21).
3.5 The Church, with its ordinances, officers and courts,
is the agency which Christ has ordained for the edification and
government of His people, for the propagation of the faith, and
for the evangelization of the world. |
Under our Standards, the Assembly may not handle a matter of
political policy or federal practice (except petitioning for relief of
conscience), unless required by the State to provide advice. Neither of
these conditions is presently applicable. The Assembly does not address
political policy, only moral principles. Thornwell wrote:
If she undertakes to meddle with the things of Caesar,
she must expect to be crushed by the sword of Caesar.... The simple
proposition that all Churchpower is ministerial and declarative,
consistently carried out, explains her whole duty. The meaning is,
that the Church can only execute what God enjoins, and can teach
as faith or duty only what God reveals....[30] |
Our Lord has given to the courts of the Church the protection and propagation
of the Gospel, and the discipline and care of his people.[31]
Those who faithfully proclaim the gospel in the power of the Spirit may,
in the purposes of God, turn everything upside down.[32]
The Gospel proclaimed brings the Kingdom of God to bear upon the world.
When our true desire is the glory of God, invariably it is discovered
that the Gospel's benefits are of immeasurable worth to human culture
and society.[33] The greatest gift the Church
can give the world is to be the Church.
For this reason our Standards insist that the nature of the church
is as "a spiritual commonwealth... (and her power) is wholly spiritual....
The sole functions of the Church, as a kingdom and government distinct
from the civil commonwealth, are to proclaim, to administer, and to enforce
the law of Christ revealed in the Scriptures."[34]
Synods, and councils are to handle or conclude nothing,
but that which is ecclesiastical... [35] |
An apostolic church built upon the Word of God understands
that the means of grace are the only tools that the courts of the Church
are to hold in their hands. By these means the Church of Jesus Christ
plunders the kingdom of darkness, and it was only when this freedom to
proclaim the Gospel was in danger that the Apostles petitioned the magistrates.[36]
Our Lord Jesus Christ provided us an infallible example when He refused
to allow matters of political and military state policy to distract Him
from the business of the Kingdom.[37] We do well,
ourselves, to heed the dangers inherent in such distractions. We remember,
and wish to respect the fact, that the founding fathers of the PCA grew
tired of political agendas in the Southern church, and hoped for a denomination
set ablaze with a love for the Gospel.
Yet, we affirm that God is the Sovereign Lord of all, and no sphere of
life lies outside His sovereign jurisdiction. Every thought is to be brought
captive to the Lordship of Jesus Christ.[38]
It is improper, therefore, to consider the question of women in the military
as merely a secular matter that has nothing to do with the members of
the Body of Christ; on the contrary, the members of the Body of Christ,
as the salt of the earth and the light of the world, bring the Lordship
of Christ to bear upon all of culture.
It is proper for Christian citizens, as citizens, to vigorously address
the matter of women in the military, just as Christian citizens, also,
appropriately bring the light of nature, the dictates of reason, and the
Word of God to bear within every sphere of their influence.
Assembly Pronouncements & Pastoral Counsel to the
Civil Magistrate
Notwithstanding the above, there is precedent in the practice
of our church for the Assembly to address matters of moral principle that
are being flagrantly transgressed in a national violation of Biblical
law. The Confession indicates, for example, that the Church must proclaim
that the "moral law doth forever bind all."[39]
In such weighty matters of moral concern and principle such as abortion,
she may legitimately wish to do so by way of a pronouncement of the Assembly.
In lesser matters troubling the church, she may wish to do so by way of
pastoral counsel.
The Church must, therefore, be ready and willing to speak to moral issues
that impact the Church and State when it is appropriate to do so. The
dilemma before us is captured well by comparing two famous citations from
Luther. The first reflects the efficacy of the Scriptures themselves.
For the Word created heaven and earth and all things
(Ps. 33:6); the Word must do this thing,. and not we poor sinners....
I simply taught, preached, and wrote God's Word; otherwise I did
nothing. And while I slept (cf Mark 4:26-29), or drank Wittenberg
beer with my friends Philip and Amsdorf, the Word so greatly weakened
the papacy that no prince or emperor ever inflicted such losses
upon it. I did nothing; the Word did everything. Had I desired to
foment trouble, I could have brought great bloodshed upon Germany;
indeed, I could have started such a game that even the emperor would
not be safe. But what would it have been? Mere fool 's play. I did
nothing; I let the Word do its work. What do you suppose is Satan's
thought when one tries to do the thing by kicking up a row? He sits
back in hell and thinks: Oh, what a fine game the poor fools are
up to now! But when we spread the Word alone and let it alone do
the work, that distresses him. For it is almighty and takes captive
the hearts, and when the hearts are captured the work will fall
by itself.[40] |
Yet Luther affirmed the need to profess the relevancy of
the truth of God in the face of Satan's attacks:
If I profess with the loudest voice and clearest exposition
every portion of the truth of God except precisely that little point
which the world and the devil are at that moment attacking, I am
not confessing Christ, however boldly I may be professing Christ.
Where the battle rages, the loyalty of the soldier is proved, and
to be steady on all the battlefield besides is mere flight and disgrace
the flinches at that point.[41] |
Despite our Church's commitment to the spirituality of
the Church and the ministerial nature of church power, our own 6th General
Assembly recognized there is an appropriate time for the Church to speak
to the civil magistrate in regard to moral principles. This it did when
declaring its historic deliverance against abortion, and the statement
referred to the writing of John Murray to justify the action:
To the Church is committed the task of proclaiming
the whole counsel of God and, therefore, the counsel of God as it
bears upon the responsibility of all persons and institutions. While
the Church is not to discharge the functions of other institutions
such as the state and family, nevertheless it is charged to define
what the functions of these institutions are, and the lines of demarcation
by which they are distinguished. It is also charged to declare and
inculcate the duties which devolve upon them. Consequently when
the civil magistrate trespasses the limits of his authority, it
is incumbent upon the Church to expose and condemn such a violation
of his authority. When laws are proposed or enacted which are contrary
to the law of God, it is the duty of the Church to oppose them and
expose their iniquity. When the civil magistrate fails to exercise
his God-given authority in the protection and promotion of the obligations,
rights, and liberties of the citizens, the Church has the right
and duty to condemn such inaction, and by its proclamation of the
counsel of God to confront the civil magistrate with his responsibility
and promote the correction of such neglect. The functions of the
civil magistrate, therefore, come within the scope of the Church's
proclamation in every respect in which the Word of God bears upon
the proper or improper discharge of these functions, and it is only
misconception of what is involved in the proclamation of the whole
counsel of God that leads to the notion that the Church has no concern
with the political sphere.[42] |
But Murray also reminds us:
It is necessary that great caution and reserve must
be exercised by the Church in making pronouncements regarding political
affairs. The caution is particularly necessary in connection with
the pronouncements and resolutions of assemblies of the Church.
Hasty analyses and proclamations must be avoided, and great care
must be exercised to ensure that pronouncements are in accord with
and necessitated by the requirements of the Word of God.[43] |
Thus we must proceed with care, seeking to establish our
beliefs in regard to these matters directly upon the teachings of the
Word of God. Historically, the PCA has avoided addressing the magistrate
unless clearly compelling moral grounds were at issue. Abortion and homosexuality
are two such occasions. We must exhort our members to remember that the
fear that the worldly kingdom is collapsing is not the same as a high
zeal for the Kingdom of God, and the addressing of our latest fears is
not to be confused with the relevancy of the Gospel. The heartbeat of
the Church must be to remember that a pure Gospel and a godly people are
the greatest power that can be unleashed in the world.
Nevertheless, a potential issue requiring such an address to the magistrate
is the conscription of women from our churches and families. In the context
of the statement of BCO 3-4 concerning the concentric circles of Church
and State, we express our conviction that the conscription of women justifies
our Assembly's condemnation.[44] Such conscription
would be tantamount to the planet of the State veering from its concentric
orbit, turning to collide with the Church. This ever-increasing possibility
requires the Church's wisdom and proactive steps to protect the moral
purity and vulnerable lives of her women. The potential for the conscription
of women facing us today is, indeed, an extraordinary matter, and we must
not take lightly the significance of other biblical churches addressing
this matter from the Word of God, as noted above in section VI, "Contemporary
Ecclesiastical Views."
VIII. Foundational Premise: The Sufficiency of Scripture
We begin by noting that the pronouncements of the Church are derived,
not from private opinions, but solely from the Scriptures. Therefore,
the Reformed understanding of the Scriptures insists "that nothing is
sin but what (the Scriptures) condemn, and nothing morally obligatory
but what they enjoin."[45]
The Reformed tradition therefore asserts that:
By the completeness of the Scriptures is meant that they
contain all the extant revelations of God designed to be a rule
of faith and practice to the Church... so that nothing can be rightly
imposed on the consciences of men as truth or duty which is not
taught directly or by necessary implication in the Holy Scriptures.
This excludes all unwritten traditions, not only but all decrees
of the visible Church; all resolutions of conventions, or other
public bodies, declaring this or that to be right or wrong, true
or false. The people of God are bound by nothing but the Word of
God.[46] |
Similarly our Standards insist:
The supreme judge by which all controversies of religion
are to be determined, and all decrees of council, opinions of ancient
writers, doctrines of men, and private spirits, are to be examined,
and in whose sentence we are to rest, can be not other but the Holy
Spirit speaking in the Scripture.[47] |
This leaves us no room to demand of our members what Scripture
does not clearly teach. It would infringe their Christian liberty and
violate their conscience if so ruled by the court.
God alone is Lord of the conscience and has left it
free from any doctrines or commandments of men which are in any
respect contrary to the Word of God, or which, in regard to matters
of faith and worship, are not governed by the Word of God.[48]
So that, to believe such doctrines, or to obey such commands,
out of conscience, is to betray true liberty of conscience: and
the requiring of an implicit, faith, and an absolute and blind obedience,
is to destroy liberty of conscience, and reason also.[49] |
Therefore, for an argument to be moral, in character, it
must be universally applicable to the State and the Church, agreeing with
the Confession's standard of "good and necessary consequence:"
The whole counsel of God concerning all things necessary
for his own glory, man's salvation, faith and life, is either expressly
set down in Scripture, or by good and necessary consequence may
be deduced from Scripture.... [50] |
In stating the Reformed understanding of the sufficiency
of Scripture, we also note:
We acknowledge that many things were done by Christ
which are not recorded (John 20.30); also that many things occurred
as appendices and supports of religion which are not particularly
mentioned in the Scriptures and were left to the prudence of the
rulers of the Church who (according to the direction of Paul, 1
Corinthians 14:40) should see that all things be done decently in
the Church. The question relates only to things necessary to salvation-whether
they belong to faith or to practice... [51] |
Similarly, John Owen:
The Holy Spirit hath so disposed of the Scripture that
the mind of God in all things concerning our faith and obedience,
in the knowledge whereof our illumination doth consist, is clearly
revealed therein. There needs no other argument to prove any thing
not to belong unto our religion that is not revealed or appointed
in the Scripture; no other to prove any truth not to be indispensable
necessary unto our faith or obedience than that it is not clearly
revealed in the Scripture.[52] |
Also, the Westminster Confession:
All things in Scripture are not alike plain in themselves,
nor alike clear unto all; yet those things which are necessary to
be known, believed, and observed for salvation, are so clearly propounded
and opened in some place of Scripture or other, that not only the
learned, but the unlearned, in a due use of the ordinary means may
attain unto a sufficient understanding of them.[53] |
IX. Scriptural Premises
Scripture teaches that God created both Adam and Eve in His Own Image,[54]
and commanded them to fill the earth, subdue it, and rule over it.[55]
Although everything comes from God, man comes from woman, and man is not
independent from woman,[56] Scripture also teaches
that Adam was created first,[57] Eve was made
from Adam,[58] Eve was created for Adam,[59]
Adam named Eve,[60] Adam is our federal head
whose name the human race bears,[61] it was Adam
God called to account for the Fall;[62] and finally,
in Adam-not Eve who first partook of the fruit-we all die.[63]
Scripture teaches that Eve, Adam's suitable helper, is called to submit
to his authority;[64] it also teaches that all
wives are to submit to their husbands;[65] thus
when Satan tempted Eve, he attacked Adam "from below,"[66]
and when Eve both acquiesced and led her husband into sin, she became
a partner with Satan in the subversion of the divine order of the first
home.[67] By failing to rebuke his wife, Adam
failed to correct the inverted order of his home.[68]
By eating the fruit, Adam betrayed his duty to protect his wife, the race,
and all creation.[69]
Despite the fact that part of God's curse of Eve is focused on her distinctive
calling as life-bearer,[70] Eve and her daughters
continue throughout time to serve the human race by bearing children and
Scripture presents woman's fulfillment of this calling as a godly expression
of both purpose and piety.[71] The child woman
carries in her womb bears God's Image and is protected by God in the Sixth
Commandment, "Thou shalt not kill."[72]
By calling the woman a weaker vessel, Scripture indicates that there is
a greater vulnerability attendant to womanhood, and calls upon her husband
to be considerate of this fact.[73] This vulnerability
of the woman and the duty of the man are further confirmed by Scripture's
command that a husband serve and lay down his life for his wife.[74]
The teaching of the New Testament itself specifically applies
the above creation doctrine of manhood and womanhood to the home and church,
and the PCA has systematically conformed her faith and practice to these
principles.[75]
Yet this Committee has been formed and given its charge largely because
of the absence in the New Testament of parallel specificity with regard
to the civil realm. Nevertheless, it is our unanimous conviction that
the above doctrinal summary provides guidance to the Church concerning
the relationship of men and women in society. Therefore, these doctrines
have application to the matter of women serving in offensive combat. We
realize that this has further implications for the propriety of women
being conscripted to serve in the military. Indeed, we have come to unanimous
agreement that women ought not to be conscripted.
We confess that, while we also are unanimous in stating that the above
doctrine of sexuality gives guidance to the Church concerning the inadvisability
of women serving in offensive combat, some among us believe that such
guidance should be limited to pastoral counsel that does not bind the
conscience while others among us believe that this counsel rises to the
level of duty.
X. Conclusion
We sympathize greatly with Philadelphia Presbytery in its
deep concerns about women serving in combat. Our private opinions lead
us to believe that this is a foolish policy fueled by the blind passions
of feminism. It is lacking in appreciation for the place of traditional
values in society and the way in which they have been informed by a biblical
understanding of manhood and womanhood. Such a proposition is almost entirely
lacking in precedent in any major human civilization, except where in
recent years it has been tried and abandoned as a failure.
We are also of the opinion that it will lead to a further deterioration
of sexual morality in our culture, while also eroding the military's morale.
Women will be at far greater risk of sexual abuse, rape, and torture.
Thus, simple "love of neighbor" leads us to warn against further implementation
of this policy.
We therefore offer the following thirteen recommendations to the 29th
General Assembly; also, we exhort our members to seek God's wisdom which
is freely offered to his children.[76] We further
encourage our members to humbly receive this biblical teaching and seek
pastoral counsel, being confident of the love, care, and guidance of our
heavenly Father in all matters that relate to the service of women in
the military.
We also encourage the Church to take full confidence in the sufficiency
of the Gospel.[77] Those who faithfully live
and proclaim the Gospel in the power of the Spirit, may, in the purposes
of God, once more turn everything upside down.[78]
There is no greater gift that we can give to the world than to be the
Church of Jesus Christ, a people who glorify God, love one another, and
hold the means of grace in our hands, hearts, and heads.[79]
When the Kingdom of God is brought to bear upon the world, and the glory
of God is our first concern, we discover that, invariably, the benefits
of the Gospel are of immeasurable worth to all human culture and society.[80]
We joyfully acknowledge that all of life is to be brought under the Lordship
of Jesus Christ. We therefore encourage the members of Christ's Church
to bring the Word of God to bear upon all spheres of life and thought.
As our lives are lived to the glory of God,[81]
the way we think and act will cause us to become the salt of the earth
and the light of the world.
We urge the Church to pray for, and support, the vital work of our chaplains
as they minister to our Armed Forces. We also affirm the labors of our
congregations as they minister to members of the Armed Forces seeking
to grow in the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ as they worship with us,
living by God's grace--for His glory and the enlargement of His Kingdom
forevermore.
XI. RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. The Philadelphia Presbytery Overture, the PRJC letter, and the Report
of the Bills and Overtures Committee be answered by this report. Adopted
2. That the PCA continue to recognize that the individual conscience,
guided by the Word of God and responsive to the counsel of the Church,
must decide concerning the propriety of voluntary service in the military. Adopted
3. That the PCA believes that military service is a just and godly calling;
however, that it presents special and difficult moral challenges in light
of the integration of women into the armed services. Adopted
4. That the women of the PCA be warned of the many difficulties and moral
and physical dangers involved in serving in the military in secular America,
due to their inherent greater vulnerability. Adopted
5. If women choose voluntarily to enter military service, they should
do so advisedly, with the recommendation that they seek supportive, rather
than active, combatant roles.
Sent back to the Committee for deliberation and to report back to the
30th Assembly
6. That the General Assembly of the PCA is formally on record as opposed
to the drafting of women into military service, in time of war or peace,
under any and all circumstances, for the reason that such governmental
actions would violate individual consciences as informed by the Word of
God.
Sent back to the Committee for deliberation and to report back to the
30th Assembly
7. That the General Assembly of the PCA is formally on record as opposed
to the assignment of women to offensive combat roles. Sent back to the
Committee for deliberation and to report back to the 30`h Assembly
Item 3 - That this Assembly declare it to be the biblical
duty of men to defend women and therefore that it opposes the service
of women in military combat positions, as well as any conscription
of women into the Armed Services of the United States.
Sent back to the Committee for deliberation
and to report back to the 30th Assembly |
8. That individual believers as citizens be urged to exercise
their godly influence to bring about authentic spiritual and moral reformation
in the military services. Adopted
9. That the PCA chaplains be encouraged in their continued ministry to
all male and female personnel in their spheres of ministry. Adopted
10. That pastors and sessions be informed of this report and be encouraged
to instruct their people in the matters it presents. Adopted
11. That the NAPARC and NAE churches be informed of the PCA's position
on this matter. Adopted
12. That this committee be dismissed. - To report back to the 30th
Assembly
COMMITTEE:
TE Stephen Leonard
TE Stephen Clark
TE Ron Swafford
TE Beryl Hubbard
RE Bentley Rayburn
|
TE Peter Lillback
TE Tim Bayly
TE Charlie Morrison
RE Keith Stoeber
RE Don Weyburn
|
Footnotes:
1 - Genesis 14
2 - Genesis 14:14
3 - Exodus 17:8-16
4 - Exodus 32:27
5 - Numbers 1:2,3a
6 - Numbers 1:45
7 - Joshua 5:13-15
8 - Luke 3:14
9 - Luke 7:1-10
10 - Luke 7:9
11- Gordon S. Wood, The Creation of the American
Republic 1776-1787 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina
Press, 1969).
12 - Robert Lecki, George Washington's War, (NY:
Harper Collins Publishers, 1992).
13 - E.g. William Jones, Christ in the Camp (Harrisonburg,
VA: Sprinkle Publications, 1986).
14 - R. L. Dabney, The Life and Campaigns of Lt.
Gen. T J. "Stonewall " Jackson (Harrisonburg, VA: Sprinkle Publications,
1983).
15 - E.g. Isaiah 13; Jeremiah 51; Joel 2; Revelation
18; and passim.
16 - For further reading, please see Tremper Longman
and Daniel G. Reid, The Holy Bible: God Is a Warrior; Loraine Boettner, The Christian Attitude Toward War; Robert A. Morey, When Is
It Right to Fight; Hoyt, Augsburger, Holmes and Brown, War: Four
Christian Views; Ellis Sandoz, Political Sermons of the American
Founding Era (1730-1805); Robert Leckie, George Washington's War;
Gordon S. Wood, Creation of the American Republic; Ned Bradford,
ed., Battles and Leaders of the Civil War; A. H. Long, Memoirs
of Robert E. Lee; John Bowers, Stonewall Jackson; Stackpole, They Met at Gettysburg; Douglas Southall Freeman, Lee's Lieutenants;
Shelby Foote, The Civil War, 3 vols.; Burke Davis, They Called
Him Stonewall.
17 - Flavius Josephus, Jewish Antiquities,
Books I-IV, translation Thackerary, H. St. J. (Cambridge, Massachusetts:
Harvard University Press, 1930) p. 621.
18 - John Chrysostom, "Homily 5 on Titus" in The
Nicene And Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, 14 vols., (Peabody, Massachusetts:
Hendrickson Publishers, 1994), 13:539.
19 - John Chrysostom, "Homily 5 on Acts" in The Nicene
And Post-Nicene Fathers, Series 1, 14 vols., (Peabody, Massachusetts:
Hendrickson Publishers, 1994), 11:30.
20 - Martin Luther, Martin Luther Table Talk.
(St. Louis, Missouri: Concordia Publishing, 1974).
21 - John Calvin, Sermons on Deuteronomy. (Edinburgh,
Scotland: Banner of Truth, 1987), p. 773.
22 - R. Potter, H. Hart, N. Riffert, W. Embree, D. McPherson, Women in the Military: Special Committee Report of the Reformed Church
in the United States, 1996, Internet on-line. [http://www.rcus.org/publications/position_papers/MILITARY.pdf.]
23 - "Resolution No. 3, On Women in Combat" in Annual
of the Southern Baptist Convention, (Nashville, TN: Executive Committee
of the SBC, 1998).
24 - 62nd General Synod, Bible Presbyterian Church, Bible Presbyterian Church Resolution 62:11 Resolution on Women in Combat,
1998, Internet: http://www.bpc.org/synod/resolutions/062_11.html
25 - Paper 98-1, in Minutes of Synod and Yearbook
of Reformed Presbyterian Church, North America, (Ridgefield Park,
NJ: Education and Publication Office of the RPCNA, 1998), pp. 85-86.
26 - WCF 31-4 and BOCO 3-3.
27 - BCO 3-4.
28 - WCF 31-2.
29 - WCF 31-4.
30 - James Henley Thornwell, "Theology as a Life
in Individuals and in the Church," Southern Presbyterian Review,
October 1859.
31 - WCF 41-4.
32 - Acts 17:6.
33 - E.g. Matthew 5:13-16.
34 - BOCO 3-3.
35 - WCF 31-5.
36 - Acts 5:28-29; 25:11.
37 - Luke 13:1-5.
38 - 2 Corinthians 10:4-5
39 - WCF 19-5.
40 - Martin Luther, Luther's Works, 55 vols.,
edited by Helmut T. Lehmann, vol. 51, Sermons I, Translated and
edited by John W. Doberstein, (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1973), 51:77-78.
41 - Martin Luther, attributed. [PCA Historical Center
note: Compare Luther's Works, Weimar Edition, Briefwechsel (Correspondence),
volume 3, page 81f.]
42 - John Murray, Collected Writings, 4 vols.
(Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1976), 1:255.
43 - Ibid, p. 258.
44 - See Recommendation 6 below.
45 - Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, 3 vols., (Grand
Rapids, MI: Eerdmans), 3:270.
46 - Ibid., 1:182-183.
47 - WCF 1-10.
48 - BOCO "Preliminary Principles," 1.
49 - WCF 20-2.
50 - WCF 1-6.
51 - Francis Turretin, Institutes of Elenctic Theology,
3 vols., (Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Publishing, 1992), 1:135.
52 - John Owen, The Works of John Owen, 16 vols., (London:
Banner of Truth, 1967), 4:192-193.
53 - WCF 1-7.
54 - Genesis 1:26-27; 5:1-2; 9:6; 1 Corinthians 11:7.
55 - Genesis 1:26-3 1; 9:1-3.
56 - John 1:3; 1 Corinthians 7:3,4; 11:8-12.
57 - Genesis 2:7,18-24; 1 Timothy 2:12-13.
58 - Genesis 2:21-23; 1 Corinthians 11:8,12.
59 - Genesis 2:18,20; 1 Corinthians 11:9.
60 - Genesis 2:23; 3:20.
61 - Genesis 1:26-28; 2:7; 3:17; Romans 5:11-19; 1 Corinthians
15:22; Note Hebrew, adam, used throughout Old Testament to name the human
race-Genesis 2:18; 5:1-2; Ezekiel 29:11; etc. The 25`h General Assembly
stated: "A 'gender-inclusive'... version is inconsistent with the Biblical
doctrine of divine inspiration." See Vern Poythress and Wayne Grudem,
The Gender-Neutral Bible Controversy: Muting the Masculinity of God's
Word (Nashville, TN: Broadman and Holman, 2000), pp. 233-251. 62 - Genesis 3:9-12.
63 - Genesis 3:6; Romans 5:12-21; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22.
64 - Genesis 2:18,20-24; 3:16; 1 Corinthians 11:3.
65 - Ephesians 5:21-24; Colossians 3:18; 1 Peter 3:1-6;
note also Numbers 30 as Scripture proof for Westminster Confession of
Faith 22:7, "Of Lawful Oaths and Vows": "No man may vow to do anything
forbidden in the Word of God, or what would hinder any duty therein commanded,
or which is not in his own power, and for the performance whereof he hath
no promise of ability from God."
66 - On Genesis 3:1 Calvin comments: "...the craftiness
of Satan betrays itself in this, that he does not directly assail the
man, but approaches him, as through a mine, in the person of his wife."
67 - Genesis 3:1-24; 2 Corinthians 11:3. On Genesis
3:16 Calvin comments: "Thus the woman, who had perversely exceeded her
proper bounds, is forced back to her own position."
68 - Genesis 3:1-6,17; "In hearkening to the voice
of his wife Adam had forfeited his position as the crown of creation and
the head of the wife, and had placed himself into the subordinate position
which belonged to the woman. Instead of showing her the way in which she
should walk, he had yielded to her direction and sinned against God" Edward
J. Young, Genesis 3: A Devotional and Expository Study (Carlisle, PA:
Banner of Truth, 1983), 130.
69 - Genesis 3:6; Romans 5:12-21; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22.
70 - Genesis 3:16.
71 - Genesis 1:22,28; 4:1; 9:1,7; Psalm 127:3-5; 128:3-6;
Malachi 2:15; 1 Timothy 2:15.
72 - Exodus 20:13; 21:22-25. (verse 22 refers to a "live
child" being born; penalties apply if there is injury to the mother or
child); Leviticus 20:1-5; Luke 1:39-44.
73 - 1 Peter 3:7.
74 - Ephesians 5:25-27.
75 - Key New Testament passages dealing with the nature
and purpose of sexuality are based on various parts of Genesis 1-3: 1
Corinthians 11:2-16 on Genesis 2:18,21-23; Ephesians 5:21-33 and Colossians
3:18-19 on Genesis 2:24 and 3:16; and I Timothy 2:8-15 and 3:1-5 on Genesis
2:7,21-22 and 3:1-6.
76 - James 1:5 But if any of you lacks wisdom, let
him ask of God, Who gives to all generously and without reproach, and
it will be given to him.
77 - Hebrews 4:12,13 For the Word of God is living and
active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as the
division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to judge
the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And there is no creature hidden
from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare to the eyes of Him
with whom we have to do.
78 - Acts 17:6 When they did not find them, they began
dragging Jason and some brethren before the city authorities, shouting,
"These men who have upset the world have come here also...."
79 - Acts 2:42-47 They were continually devoting themselves
to the apostles' teaching and to fellowship, to the breaking of bread
and to prayer. Everyone kept feeling a sense of awe; and many wonders
and signs were taking place through the apostles. And all those who had
believed were together and had all things in common; and they began selling
their property and possessions and were sharing them with all, as anyone
might have need. Day by day continuing with one mind in the temple, and
breaking bread from house to house, they were taking their meals together
with gladness and sincerity of heart, praising God and having favor with
all the people. And the Lord was adding to their number day by day those
who were being saved.
80 - Matthew 5:13-16 You are the salt of the earth;
but if the salt has become tasteless, how can it be made salty again?
It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled
under foot by men. You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill
cannot be hidden; nor does anyone light a lamp and put it under a basket,
but on the lampstand, and it gives light to all who are in the house.
Let your light shine before men in such a way that they may see your good
works, and glorify your Father Who is in heaven.
81 - 1 Corinthians 10:31 Whether, then, you eat or drink
or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God.
Index of all
relevant texts in the 2001 and 2002 PCA Minutes |
Women
in the Military (WIM) Committee Final Report ---------------------- |
M30GA, 30-54,
p. 282 and 30-57,
p. 283 |
Communications
1, 2 and 6--------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, pp. 287 - 289 |
Consensus Report 2001------------------------------------------------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 259 - 278 |
Final
Recommendations 2002------------------------------------------------------ |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 285 |
Final
Recommendations, 2001------------------------------------------------------ |
M29GA, 29-57, XI, p. 277 & M30GA,
p. 286 |
"Man's Duty
to Protect Woman" [Majority Report, 2001] ------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, pp. 278 - 308 |
Minority
Report 2002---------------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 287 |
Minority Report
2001---------------------------------------------------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 308 - 320 |
Overtures 2, 21 and 26--------------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-53, III, 7, p. 245; 30-57,
5, p. 287 |
Supplemental
Report 2002----------------------------------------------------------- |
M30GA, 30-57, p. 287 |
"Recommendations
for the Wise Counsel of the Church" ------------------- |
M29GA, 29-57, p. 308 - 320 |
Motion
to Send Report to the President [motion failed] |
M30GA, 30-60, p. 290 |
©PCA Historical Center, 12330 Conway Road, St. Louis, MO, 2018. All Rights Reserved. |